Ethical Movie Review: Blood Diamond Essay
0. The two main issues identified and discussed are; child soldiers and conflict diamonds. So when the regulation is hard, we should take care of some roots of the problem. Children living in poverty and with a rough childhood, bad parenting in a chaotic country can easily tend to blame the government. Therefore something countries long to take a part in. They make that history matter to them as soon as they attend the diamond meeting. One can argue that adults have individual factors when presenting different childhood environments, and this is true, Best Place To Buy Diamonds In Nyc but to determine how a person will act when born is not possible. Put simply, utilitarianism is not supported because their actions are not for the greater good. In order to do so descriptive ethical theories will be tools in the examination. As we can exclude most individual factors, one can start by blaming environment for actions performed by human beings. They may acknowledge that people are getting harmed, but it is not their responsibility since someone else would take their place if they were not there. The following section will concentrate more on how these issues occurred. The first ethical theory that can be linked to the response of child soldiers is egoism. It is said to be an exclusive club as only members can trade with members. This may very well be one of the reasons for the use of child soldiers. There are to significant impacts on worldââ¬â¢s society for this to be disregarded. 2. There are two main categories to address, individual factors and situational factors. In order to do so they have to utilise the resources available, ergo using children as soldiers and living in utilitarianism. Consequentialist theories focus on the outcome, and one can state that is what has to be the focus in order to actually use so young people for means in war. One can even go so far to say that both the consequentialist theories supports the actions performed by this rebel group, they are fighting for their own desires and what they believe is the greater good. Not in the same way as the children described above, but in the sense that they believe that if they do not take advantage of these diamonds, someone else will. We will discuss this issue further in the next section of the essay, but first the issue of blood diamonds will be addressed. Ethics of rights and justice has a large focus on human dignity and humanity; one can reasonably state that there is neither in the use of children as soldiers. My main lens of ethical theories will consist of the four western theories, this includes, egoism, utilitarianism, ethics of duties and ethics of rights. So what possible solution can be proposed to it all? 2. The imitative is a non-government, non-corporate and therefore independent imitative which sertify conflict diamonds. That concludes this section of the essay; the next one will be a short summary and review of the movie. Diamonds is a good defined as a want, it is not a need. Not ignore the kids once they have become soldiers. If a system would be demanded by the people, one could argue that the power which lies with the people is strong enough to make the corporations act. Archer here says is very on the spot on how unethical the operations of diamond companies deceive the world. Iââ¬â¢d say their just people.â⬠(Imdb. The way from there can be that children were seen to be useful. As the movie shows us, the diamond industry is powerful and unethical. The consumer has to make sure that what they are buying does not support conflicts in other nations. For every ethical theory that include morality, honour, or even the greater good, these people do not seem to care, and it is hard to find any way to justify their means except for financial winnings, which is sad, unethical and immoral. In addition their locus of control is probably low in a kids mind, and seeking control in authority figures. The three main characters each present separate ethical morality, the ââ¬Å”soldier of fortuneâ⬠gives us an egoistic mindset, but gets softer as the movie closes to the end. The way the movie presents both the understanding for the desire in egoism as well as showing that it is possible to change and also show compassion a moral twist. The second character is a fisherman presenting a more feminist ethical theory, showing much love for family and care for people, even a man that is likely to steal from him. The last character is a female journalist fighting for fairness and justice. And Maddy Bowen can easily be linked to several ethical theories, but closest to theories of justice. Her fight for fairness and getting the west to open their eyes gives another moral angel to the situation in Sierra Leone. All in all Zwick with good help from his actors presents the issues of child soldiers and blood diamonds in a very good way, one can see that the diamond corporations of the world did not like it, they fought the movie for a long time and ended up with a 15$ US million PR campaign (PRWatch 2006) that resulted in a website called diamondfacts.org. This is interpreted as a sign that he is pushing on the correct buttons and may be something that forces change. I do not believe I would change anything with his movie, in order to reach the target market a combination of fiction and facts are needed. This essay has proved that the use of child soldiers as well as trading conflict diamonds is unethical and has asked the world to act as a solution; there is power within the people that should be used to pressure changes to these issues. When they at the end then still buy blood diamonds – agree with this – , their actions can be nothing else than both immoral and unethical. The third maxim asks if the actions are universally accepted, there is no need for explanation here, it is not accepted by the world. The remaining three models are not going to be described in detail here, but tell us a bit different story. It is important to do this properly. Additionally, some of these theories will be expanded and other theories that do not tend so much towards ethical absolutism will be added. Again the financial desires of diamond companies seems to be all they care about, and if they believe that everything else is not their problem, then egoism will accept the actions of these people. The search for authority and some sort of place for them in society can make them join what they feel is the right fight, or maybe just to get some meaning in their lives. More accurately the strategy used to rationalise unethical behaviour. It is important to distinguish from selfishness, and one can argue that this action can be justified as an egoistic mindset, not a selfish point of view. Try to give some potential answer to the problems. 3. Zwick presents ethical issues in an action packed thriller filled with good acting and effects. Beginning this will be with exploring the relevant situational factors. The next point will pursue reasoning for which diamonds create unethical behaviour. There is a but here, and as the last paragraph stated, they knowingly deceive and knowingly know what the history of their stones are. 1. The question is; how can the use of kids as soldiers be justified? The society has not provided the safety that a child needs so it seeks it, the cognitive moral stage these kids live in is named preconvention. 1. They have founded brutal conflictsâ⬠¦ that have resulted in the death and displacement of millions of people. The rest of the world would probably disagree to the use of kids, but how can they judge a situation that for most of them is so far away that they can only be prejudice not knowledgeable about the situation? This is true, there are none born evil or good, it is our actions that show us what we become. So we can now make a short summary to say that with a pluralistic (maybe a bit more relativistic) view on the two consequentialist ethical theories the use of kids to bear arms can be justified. For the remaining theories on this issue, there is no one that can be associated with the use of children for these actions. I believe that individual factors do not play an important role compared to situational factors. See no other solution than to take the fight in their own hands. A short summary of the findings in the text. The situation described in the movie is a rebel group fighting the government in which they believe are corrupt. Aiding criminal and horrifying actions like these should never be done.â⬠(Imdb. Finally the conclusion will be presented by a combination of a film review. Thereby just adapting more children as they felt the need. And as mentioned earlier supporting such horrible military actions defies what the second maxim of ethical duties suggests. The other factors all depends on environment.
About This Quiz
